Kit Fine on Truthmakers, Relevance, and Non-classical Logic

Chapter 1. Introduction (Federico L.G. Faroldi and Frederik Van De Putte).- Chapter 2. Short autobiography (Kit Fine).- Chapter 3. Modern faces of filtration (Johan van Benthem and Nick Bezhanishvili).- Chapter 4. Re ections on filtration: A response to 'modern faces of filtration' by Johan van Benthem and Nick Bezhanishvili (Kit Fine).- Chapter 5. From felicitous models to answer set programming (Vladimir Lifschitz).- Chapter 6. Selective programming: Response to 'From felicitous models to answer set programming' by Vladimir Lifschitz (Kit Fine).- Chapter 7. Fine's semantics for relevance logic and its relevance (Katalin Bimbó and Michael Dunn).- Chapter 8.Truthmaker semantics for relevance logic: Response to 'Fine's semantics for relevance logic and its relevance' by Katalin Bimbó and J. Michael Dunn (Kit Fine).- Chapter 9. Conjunctive and disjunctive parts (Mark Jago).- Chapter 10. To be or not to be disjunctive: Response to Mark Jago's 'conjunctive and disjunctive parts' (Kit Fine).- Chapter 11. Truth-maker semantics for substructural logics (Ondrej Majer, Igor Sedlár and Vít Puncochár).- Chapter 12. Forms of conditionality: Response to 'truth-maker semantics for some substructural logics' by Ondrej Majer, , Igor Sedlár and Vít Puncochár.- Chapter 13. A strictly exact truthmaker semantics for non-transitive relevance and classical logic (Peter Verdée).- Chapter 14. The ghost of impossibility: Response to Peter Verdée's 'truthmakers and relevance for FDE, LP, K3 and CL'.- Chapter 15. Truthmaker semantics for epistemic logic (Peter Hawke and Aybuke Ozgun).- Chapter 16. An epistemized truthmaker semantics for epistemic logic: Response to Hawke's and Ozgun's 'truthmaker semantics for epistemic logic' (Kit Fine).- Chapter 17. Counterfactuals, infinity and paradox (Andrew Bacon).- Chapter 18. Defense of a truthmaker approach to counterfactuals: Response to Andrew Bacon's 'counterfactuals, infinity and paradox' (Kit Fine).- Chapter 19. On the notion of aboutness in

Federico L.G. Faroldi is associate professor of philosophy, law and artificial intelligence at the University of Pavia, Italy. He was previously Senior Researcher in Bern (Switzerland), where he directed an Ambizione project (SNSF), Senior Researcher of the Flanders Research Foundation (FWO) at Ghent University (Belgium) and Lise Meitner Fellow of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) in Austria. He has studied or worked in Pisa, Florence, St Andrews, Oxford, ENS Rue d'Ulm (Paris), New York University, University of Southern California and Berkeley. His main interests are deontic logic, hyperintensionality, formal ethics, and the philosophy of AI. His most recent book is Hyperintensionality and Normativity (Springer).




Frederik Van De Putte is assistant professor in philosophy at the Erasmus University of Rotterdam (Netherlands). He was previously a Marie Curie fellow at the University of Bayreuth (Germany) and a postdoctoral researcher of the Flanders Research Foundation(FWO) at Ghent University. He has published in major journals in analytic (formal) philosophy, on a variety of subjects in logic, formal epistemology, philosophy of science, and formal ethics. He serves as editor for Erkenntnis, an International Journal of Scientific Philosophy and was guest editor for several journal issues.