Executive Decision-Making and the Courts (ePub)
Revisiting the Origins of Modern Judicial Review
(Sprache: Englisch)
In this book, leading experts from across the common law world assess the impact of four seminal House of Lords judgments decided in the 1960s: Ridge v Baldwin, Padfeld v Minister of Agriculture, Conway v Rimmer, and Anisminic v Foreign Compensation...
sofort als Download lieferbar
eBook (ePub)
Fr. 60.90
inkl. MwSt.
- Kreditkarte, Paypal, Rechnung
- Kostenloser tolino webreader
Produktdetails
Produktinformationen zu „Executive Decision-Making and the Courts (ePub)“
In this book, leading experts from across the common law world assess the impact of four seminal House of Lords judgments decided in the 1960s: Ridge v Baldwin, Padfeld v Minister of Agriculture, Conway v Rimmer, and Anisminic v Foreign Compensation Commission. The 'Quartet' is generally acknowledged to have marked a turning point in the development of court-centred administrative law, and can be understood as a 'formative moment' in the emergence of modern judicial review.
These cases are examined not only in terms of the points each case decided, and their contribution to administrative law doctrine, but also in terms of the underlying conception of the tasks of administrative law implicit in the Quartet. By doing so, the book sheds new light on both the complex processes through which the modern system of judicial review emerged and the constitutional choices that are implicit in its jurisprudence. It further reflects upon the implications of these historical processes for how the achievements, failings and limitations of the common law in reviewing actions of the executive can be evaluated.
These cases are examined not only in terms of the points each case decided, and their contribution to administrative law doctrine, but also in terms of the underlying conception of the tasks of administrative law implicit in the Quartet. By doing so, the book sheds new light on both the complex processes through which the modern system of judicial review emerged and the constitutional choices that are implicit in its jurisprudence. It further reflects upon the implications of these historical processes for how the achievements, failings and limitations of the common law in reviewing actions of the executive can be evaluated.
Autoren-Porträt
TT Arvind is Professor of Law at the University of York, UK.Richard Kirkham is Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of Sheffield, UK.
Daithí Mac Síthigh is Professor of Law and Innovation at Queen's University Belfast, UK.
Lindsay Stirton is Professor of Public Law at the University of Sussex, UK.
Bibliographische Angaben
- 2021, 1. Auflage, 576 Seiten, Englisch
- Herausgegeben: Tt Arvind, Richard Kirkham, Daithí Mac Síthigh, Lindsay Stirton
- Verlag: Bloomsbury UK
- ISBN-10: 1509930345
- ISBN-13: 9781509930340
- Erscheinungsdatum: 25.02.2021
Abhängig von Bildschirmgrösse und eingestellter Schriftgrösse kann die Seitenzahl auf Ihrem Lesegerät variieren.
eBook Informationen
- Dateiformat: ePub
- Grösse: 1.18 MB
- Mit Kopierschutz
Sprache:
Englisch
Kopierschutz
Dieses eBook können Sie uneingeschränkt auf allen Geräten der tolino Familie lesen. Zum Lesen auf sonstigen eReadern und am PC benötigen Sie eine Adobe ID.
Kommentar zu "Executive Decision-Making and the Courts"
0 Gebrauchte Artikel zu „Executive Decision-Making and the Courts“
Zustand | Preis | Porto | Zahlung | Verkäufer | Rating |
---|
Schreiben Sie einen Kommentar zu "Executive Decision-Making and the Courts".
Kommentar verfassen