The Parousia and Its Rereadings

The Author: Osvaldo D. Vena is Associate Professor of New Testament Interpretation at Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary in Evanston, Illinois. He received his Th.D. from Superior Institute of Theological Education (ISEDET) in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Although this is his first book, he has published articles in both Spanish and English.

"Osvaldo Vena tackles a question that has both propelled and haunted New Testament scholarship since the end of the nineteenth century. Applying J. Severino Croatto's hermeneutic of rereading to interpreting the evolution of tradition, Vena offers a painstaking and eminently judicious examination of evolving conceptions of the Parousia in early Christianity. Vena situates each conception of the Parousia in its socio-historical (and community) context, arguing that futuristic expectations decrease as ecclesial institutionalism increases; at the same time, diminishing eschatological fervor reflects growing ecclesial accommodation to the wider society. Although each re-reading preserves something of the old, and a tension between realized and futuristic eschatology persists from one period to another, the transformation of earliest apocalyptic expectation during the first seventy years of the Christian movement suggests a trajectory from countercultural resistance toward cultural accommodation. Vena's important study carefully consolidates the gains of previous scholarship, injects fresh perspectives into the debate, and provides a highly readable and comprehensive discussion of early Christian eschatology." (Charles H. Cosgrove, Professor of New Testament Studies and Christian Ethics, Northern Baptist Theological Seminary)
"Osvaldo Vena's elaborate and carefully argued work contributes significantly to an understanding of the rich diversity encompassed by the phrase 'New Testament eschatological expectation'. He explores that diversity both with respect to its roots in the Hebrew Bible and in the cultures that surround the early Christian communities, and in the 're-readings' of those traditions in the various periods of New Testament history marked by concerns for 'transformation', 'mission', and 'consolidation'. Vena demonstrates conclusively the fallacy of seeking a single New Testament view of eschatology, like so many other issues of historical and theological