Math Without Numbers
(Sprache: Englisch)
An illustrated tour of the structures and patterns we call "math"
The only numbers in this book are the page numbers.
Math Without Numbers is a vivid, conversational, and wholly original guide to the three main branches of abstract math...
The only numbers in this book are the page numbers.
Math Without Numbers is a vivid, conversational, and wholly original guide to the three main branches of abstract math...
lieferbar
versandkostenfrei
Buch (Kartoniert)
Fr. 21.90
inkl. MwSt.
- Kreditkarte, Paypal, Rechnungskauf
- 30 Tage Widerrufsrecht
Produktdetails
Produktinformationen zu „Math Without Numbers “
Klappentext zu „Math Without Numbers “
An illustrated tour of the structures and patterns we call "math"The only numbers in this book are the page numbers.
Math Without Numbers is a vivid, conversational, and wholly original guide to the three main branches of abstract math topology, analysis, and algebra which turn out to be surprisingly easy to grasp. This book upends the conventional approach to math, inviting you to think creatively about shape and dimension, the infinite and infinitesimal, symmetries, proofs, and how these concepts all fit together. What awaits readers is a freewheeling tour of the inimitable joys and unsolved mysteries of this curiously powerful subject.
Like the classic math allegory Flatland, first published over a century ago, or Douglas Hofstadter's Godel, Escher, Bach forty years ago, there has never been a math book quite like Math Without Numbers. So many popularizations of math have dwelt on numbers like pi or zero or infinity. This book goes well beyond to questions such as: How many shapes are there? Is anything bigger than infinity? And is math even true? Milo Beckman shows why math is mostly just pattern recognition and how it keeps on surprising us with unexpected, useful connections to the real world.
The ambitions of this book take a special kind of author. An inventive, original thinker pursuing his calling with jubilant passion. A prodigy. Milo Beckman completed the graduate-level course sequence in mathematics at age sixteen, when he was a sophomore at Harvard; while writing this book, he was studying the philosophical foundations of physics at Columbia under Brian Greene, among others.
Lese-Probe zu „Math Without Numbers “
shapeMathematicians like to overthink things. It's sort of what we do. We take some concept that everyone understands on a basic level, like symmetry or equality, and pick it apart, trying to find a deeper meaning to it.
Take shape. We all know more or less what a shape is. You look at an object and you can easily tell if it's a circle or a rectangle or whatever else. But a mathematician would ask: What is a shape? What makes something the shape it is? When you identify an object by shape, you're ignoring its size, its color, what it's used for, how old it is, how heavy it is, who brought it here, and who's responsible for taking it home when we leave. What are you not ignoring? What is it that you're getting across when you say something is shaped like a circle?
These questions are, of course, pointless. For all practical uses, your intuitive understanding of shape is fine-no significant decision in your life will ever hinge on how exactly we define the word "shape." It's just an interesting thing to think about, if you have some extra time and you want to spend it thinking about shapes.
Let's say you do. Here's a question you might think to ask yourself: How many shapes are there?
It's a simple enough question, but it isn't easy to answer. A more precise and limited version of this question, called the generalized Poincaré Conjecture, has been around for well over a century and we still don't know of anyone who's been able to solve it. Lots of people have tried, and one professional mathematician recently won a million-dollar prize for finishing up a big chunk of the problem. But there are still many categories of shapes left uncounted, so we still don't know, as a global community, how many shapes there are.
Let's try to answer the question. How many shapes are there? For lack of a better idea, it seems like a useful thing to do to just start drawing shapes and see where that takes us.
... mehr
It looks like the answer to our question is going to depend on how exactly we divide things into different shape categories. Is a big circle the same shape as a small circle? Are we counting "squiggle" as one big category, or should we split them up based on the different ways they squiggle? We need a general rule to settle debates like this, so the question of "how many shapes" won't come down to case-by-case judgment calls.
There are several rules we could pick here that would all do a fine job of deciding when two shapes are the same or different. If you're a carpenter or an engineer, you'll want a very strict and precise rule, one that calls two shapes the same only if all their lengths and angles and curves match up perfectly. That rule leads to a kind of math called geometry, where shapes are rigid and exact and you do things like draw perpendicular lines and calculate areas.
We want something a little looser. We're trying to find every possible shape, and we don't have time to sort through thousands of different variations of squiggles. We want a rule that's generous about when to consider two things the same shape, a that breaks up the world of shapes into a manageable number of broad categories.
New Rule
Two shapes are the same if you can turn one into the other by stretching and squeezing, without any ripping or gluing.
This rule is the central idea of topology, which is like a looser, trippier version of geometry. In topology, shapes are made out of a thin, endlessly stretchy material that you can twist and pull and manipulate like gum or dough. In topology, the size of a shape doesn't matter.
Also, a square is the same as a rectangle, and a circle is the same as an oval.
Now it gets weird. If you think about it using this "stretching-and-squeezing" rule, a circle and a square are considered the same shape!
Before you go tell your loved ones that you read a book about math and learned that a square is a
It looks like the answer to our question is going to depend on how exactly we divide things into different shape categories. Is a big circle the same shape as a small circle? Are we counting "squiggle" as one big category, or should we split them up based on the different ways they squiggle? We need a general rule to settle debates like this, so the question of "how many shapes" won't come down to case-by-case judgment calls.
There are several rules we could pick here that would all do a fine job of deciding when two shapes are the same or different. If you're a carpenter or an engineer, you'll want a very strict and precise rule, one that calls two shapes the same only if all their lengths and angles and curves match up perfectly. That rule leads to a kind of math called geometry, where shapes are rigid and exact and you do things like draw perpendicular lines and calculate areas.
We want something a little looser. We're trying to find every possible shape, and we don't have time to sort through thousands of different variations of squiggles. We want a rule that's generous about when to consider two things the same shape, a that breaks up the world of shapes into a manageable number of broad categories.
New Rule
Two shapes are the same if you can turn one into the other by stretching and squeezing, without any ripping or gluing.
This rule is the central idea of topology, which is like a looser, trippier version of geometry. In topology, shapes are made out of a thin, endlessly stretchy material that you can twist and pull and manipulate like gum or dough. In topology, the size of a shape doesn't matter.
Also, a square is the same as a rectangle, and a circle is the same as an oval.
Now it gets weird. If you think about it using this "stretching-and-squeezing" rule, a circle and a square are considered the same shape!
Before you go tell your loved ones that you read a book about math and learned that a square is a
... weniger
Autoren-Porträt von Milo Beckman
Milo Beckman has been addicted to math since a young age. Born in Manhattan in 1995, he began taking math classes at Stuyvesant High School at age eight and was captain of the New York City Math Team by age thirteen. His diverse projects and independent research have been featured in the New York Times, FiveThirtyEight, Good Morning America, Salon, the Huffington Post, the Chronicle of Higher Education, Business Insider, the Boston Globe, Gothamist, the Economist, and others. He worked for three tech companies, two banks, and a US senator before retiring at age nineteen to teach math in New York, China, and Brazil, and to work on this book.
Bibliographische Angaben
- Autor: Milo Beckman
- 2022, 224 Seiten, Masse: 13,8 x 20,9 cm, Kartoniert (TB), Englisch
- Verlag: Dutton
- ISBN-10: 1524745561
- ISBN-13: 9781524745561
- Erscheinungsdatum: 28.04.2022
Sprache:
Englisch
Pressezitat
With charm, unwavering enthusiasm, and a lot of cartoons, Math Without Numbers waltzes the reader through a garden of higher mathematics. Jordan Ellenberg, professor of mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, author of How Not To Be Wrong
So delightful! Mathematics is playful, surprising, and enchanting, but those qualities are often obscured behind intimidating equations and formalism. Milo Beckman brings them out into the open for everyone to share.
Sean Carroll, author of Something Deeply Hidden: Quantum Worlds and the Emergence of Spacetime
Math Without Numbers explores deep mathematical topics and shows how mathematicians think in completely readable prose. The puzzles and games are bonuses. Very enjoyable.
Will Shortz, crossword editor, The New York Times
The book s accessible language and illustrations makes understanding some of the most complex (and possibly most intimidating) math concepts feel as effortless as breathing. Beckman s approachable writing and Erazo s delightful illustration combine to tell an insightful and entertaining story about math.
Giorgia Lupi and Stefanie Posavec, co-authors of Dear Data and Observe, Collect, Draw!
This is the book for you if you ve ever been curious about the wonderful ideas and concepts underlying modern math, but been too frightened to make a start. Milo Beckman gives us a friendly introduction to unfamiliar concepts and ideas that show why modern math is such a fascinating and rewarding branch of human thought.
Graham Farmelo, author of The Universe Speaks in Numbers
Math Without Numbers offers an accessible and whimsically illustrated glimpse of what pure mathematicians study, all while capturing the playful spirit with which they do it.
Grant Sanderson, creator of 3blue1brown
A cheerful, chatty, and charming trip through the world of mathematics and its relation
... mehr
to the world of people and not a number in sight! Everyone should read this delightful book. Even mathematicians.
Ian Stewart, professor of mathematics, University of Warwick, author of Do Dice Play God?
The book's accessible language and illustrations makes understanding some of the most complex (and possibly most intimidating) math concepts feel as effortless as breathing.
Stefanie Posavec, co-author of Dear Data and Observe, Collect, Draw!
The book does an excellent job of capturing the essence of what makes math interesting while avoiding intimidating technical details. A fine addition to my collection.
Shareef Jackson, STEM Diversity Advocate
A playful paean to the pleasures of studying higher math . . . Readers with an abundance of curiosity and the time to puzzle over Beckman s many examples, riddles, and questions, will make many fascinating discoveries.
Publishers Weekly
A pleasant, amusing look at mathematics as a description of everything.
Kirkus Reviews
Ian Stewart, professor of mathematics, University of Warwick, author of Do Dice Play God?
The book's accessible language and illustrations makes understanding some of the most complex (and possibly most intimidating) math concepts feel as effortless as breathing.
Stefanie Posavec, co-author of Dear Data and Observe, Collect, Draw!
The book does an excellent job of capturing the essence of what makes math interesting while avoiding intimidating technical details. A fine addition to my collection.
Shareef Jackson, STEM Diversity Advocate
A playful paean to the pleasures of studying higher math . . . Readers with an abundance of curiosity and the time to puzzle over Beckman s many examples, riddles, and questions, will make many fascinating discoveries.
Publishers Weekly
A pleasant, amusing look at mathematics as a description of everything.
Kirkus Reviews
... weniger
Kommentar zu "Math Without Numbers"
0 Gebrauchte Artikel zu „Math Without Numbers“
Zustand | Preis | Porto | Zahlung | Verkäufer | Rating |
---|
Schreiben Sie einen Kommentar zu "Math Without Numbers".
Kommentar verfassen